Hoong Yee, about to engage her superpowers in flip charting
It is a good thing to know what you are good at.
According to my wise thirteen-year-old son, I am good at lunch, sewing on buttons, and getting better at playing Action Potato on my phone. Oh, and hugs, lots of them.
My dear friend Barbara Schaffer Bacon who is the Co-Director of Animating Democracy at Americans for the Art thought I would be good as a discussion leader for a conference session at the Americans for the Arts 2011 Annual Convention earlier this month in San Diego.
I was thrilled to be joined by Josie Talamantez, Assistant Chief of Grant Programs for the California Arts Council, and Sioux Trujillo, Associate Director of Community + Public Arts DETROIT.
Actually, I was really very good at writing stuff on flip charts. I am a force to be reckoned with when I have a marker in my hand.
“Do you think anyone will show up? I don’t know why they stuck us in this out of the way room and scheduled this session at 4:30 pm on a Friday afternoon when everyone is out on field trips.”
Barbara looked at the scattered chairs and began pushing them together.
“If ten people show up, they will be the ones who really want to be here and we will have a great conversation.”
Barbara smiled and bobbed her head in agreement. “You’re right. It’ll be just fine.”
After the first ten people came, Barbara introduced the topic, “From Community Arts to Social Justice: Practicing and Supporting Arts for Change.”
We went around the room to hear what everyone was doing in this work. By this time, all the chairs were filled and more were being brought in. Some people decided to sit on the floor.
Much of what was valuable came from everyone’s attempt to answer the following three questions:
How do you name and frame this kind of work?
How is community arts investment different from and/or similar to supporting art making and presenting?
What outcomes are we seeking and what influences our definitions of success?
For me, this was an inspiring place to use one of my superpowers, my X-ray vision that allows me to see through words.
As I captured answers and thoughts on flip chart sheets from this extremely passionate group, my mind was racing. We are creating a field from the wild wild west of community building, youth development, civic engagement, artmaking, healing — all of the above and more. How?
By recognizing the need for our own language, an infrastructure to grow upon, and ways to measure our process and outcomes. This conversation was the genesis of defining who we are, what we need, and what we are doing.
Back at the Batcave, I synthesized the following from the session notes for all of you to think about and please, add to or challenge:
who are we?
cultural provocateur
creative translator
influencer
transmitter
interrupter
evocateur
priest
therapist
of culture
community organizer
not hub, but connector
groomers of expectations
protectors
tradition retriever
defenders
theater of the oppressed
theater in the rest of America
what do we need?
alternative structures for artmakers
language that is formalized, standardized and consistent in order to be translated
matrix and framework for evaluation. how do we measure this?
cultural access and education
art for social change and resistance
good vs. goods conversation
art is an answer
support for artists
cultural access
arts for social change
transformation of space, place and experiences
to give ourselves time to build trust
infrastructure
avoid drive by engagement
what are we doing?
recovering from trauma
healing through placemaking
generating joy, preventing crime
community engagement through story telling
helping the community heal, change itself
healing through altars
healing
entrepreneurship
co-powering
community dreaming
cultural placemaking
Next steps:
I look forward to being in the same space with you and talking more about how we can help each other give form and power to this field.